|
By Pat Carlson, TEF President, 12/21/09
The
climate change conference held from
December 7-18, 2009 in Copenhagen,
Denmark had very little to do with climate
change and everything to do with the dismantling
of America. There were three groups represented
at the conference of the parties (COP15) – the
rich countries, the poor countries and the most
radical environmental groups. This was the
largest United Nations conference ever conducted
with 45,000 participants from 140 countries held
in a facility built to accommodate 15,000.
COP15 may
have been a
climate change
conference
espousing lifestyle
changes
producing
smaller carbon
footprints, but
that seemed
to apply to
everyone but
a few select
delegates. The
conference
supplied 1200
limos, only two
of which were
hybrid, to meet requests by delegates. The demand was so
great limos were driven in from Germany and Sweden.
One hundred forty private jets flew into Copenhagen and
surrounding airports for the conference. One can only
imagine how large a carbon footprint that created. Riding
bicycles and taking mass transit was expected of everyone
else, including MerryLynn and me. We took a bus and
rode the subway for over an hour every morning and
evening to get to the conference.
Before the
conference even
began, United
Nations International
Children’s
Emergency Fund
(UNICEF) held a
Children’s Climate
Forum with
teens brought to
Copenhagen to
discuss climate
change and how
they must commit
to change for the
good of the planet.
The kids, ages 14-17
from 44 countries,
were told that if they
were forced to live in
an environmentally compromised planet, they wouldn’t
be able to enjoy their lives fully, since threats to their
health and wellbeing would increase.
I spoke with a 16 yr. old from Florida named Pulkit
Agrawal, one of the four U.S. Climate Ambassadors
at COP15, who said he was worried South Florida
would soon be under water if the glaciers continue to
melt. Pulkit first attended a Junior 8 Summit held in
conjunction with the G8 Summit last July in Italy where
young people discussed their rights as related to the global
financial crisis. Pulkit along with the others from the U.S.
met with President Obama in Italy, a heady experience for
any young person.
The Obama administration went all out to prove that
they had changed the U.S. into a world leader on climate
change. Two large rooms called the “U.S. Center ’09”
were dedicated to back-to-back events every day of the
conference. The 0 in the ’09 resembles Obama’s campaign
icon 0. The 0 was filled in with something resembling the
American flag but it was definitely not Ol’ Glory.
Cabinet members such as EPA Administrator, Lisa Jackson
and Department of the Interior Secretary, Ken Salazar
were brought in to make presentations. When Lisa Jackson
made the announcement the EPA would start regulating
CO2 as a pollutant, she received a standing ovation from
her liberal audience. Ken Salazar announced among other
things that 1000 square miles of public land in 24 areas
has been set aside for solar panels.
Obama is still campaigning but now it is for world leader.
He arrived on the last day of the conference knowing the
talks were at a stalemate but refused to leave without
claiming some kind of victory. He met with countries
most of the day, but China refused to attend several
of the meetings. As the two largest emitters of green
house gases (GHG), China and the U.S. had to reach an
agreement for anything else to go forward. According to
the New York Times, Obama found out China was in a
closed meeting with Brazil, India, and South Africa, and
he was not invited. So he and Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton burst into the meeting uninvited, and several
hours later, Obama emerged claiming “an unprecedented
breakthrough” had occurred creating the “Copenhagen
Accord.”
The only country to compromise in the “Copenhagen
Accord” was the U.S. Obama and Clinton said the U.S.
would “contribute” $100 billion per year until 2020,
contingent on an agreement being reached where China
would allow international monitoring of its emissions.
China adamantly refused saying it would “infringe on
its sovereignty.” The new accord is said to satisfy this
requirement by developing countries submitting an
international report of their emission reductions and
activities, but nothing is in place to confirm the claims.
However, the U.S. is still committing $100 billion per
year until 2020 and to an additional $30 billion “fast
start” money to be paid by developed countries through
2012. This money is supposed to be paid multilaterally
by developed countries, but individual countries have not
made commitments. So if history repeats itself, the U.S.
will again pay the largest proportion of a non-binding
accord.
A non-binding accord at COP15 is good news, but
unfortunately, this climate change issue will not go
away. When the U.S. Senate ratified the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in
1992, the U.S. accepted the responsibility of protecting
the environment by paying the developing world.
Since that time, the U.S. has failed to ratify a treaty
that specifies how this responsibility will be met. (The
UNFCCC is based on the principle that parties should act
to protect the climate system “on the basis of equality
and in accordance with their common but differentiated
responsibilities and respective capabilities.”)
Since the UNFCCC was created and especially after the
Kyoto Protocol went into effect in 2005, developing
countries have been given new global status. They’ve
had a taste of financial and technology advances given to
them from developed countries and now see this global
entitlement as a right. If not delivered, they want “climate
justice.”
This new global status of developing nations has given
a voice to: Communist dictators such as Hugo Chavez of
Venezuela and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, to the
smallest countries and to radical environmental groups,
who turn to the UN when individual governments reject
their liberal agendas. Chavez and Ahmadinejad use the
global microphone to spew hatred for capitalism and the
United States.
Radical environmental groups, including the Sierra
Club, Environmental Defense Fund, World Wildlife
Federation, have had 17 years to establish their groups in
developing countries and through education systems have
brainwashed a generation of young people into believing
the planet is in environmental distress. These young
people turned out in the hundreds at COP15 and were the
main cause of protests and violence in the streets; their
passion for saving the planet borders on militarism.
After two years of negotiations and millions of dollars
spent on travel and hype, the only accomplishment of
the COP15 climate change talks was the non-binding
Copenhagen Accord. However, the environmental groups
and the developing countries will be back next year at the
next COP in Mexico City in bigger numbers making even
more extreme demands. |